Untold Concepts About 360 Evaluation Tools You Did Not Find Out In Secondary School

I recently listened to a podcast about the aptness of 360 evaluation tools and would dearly like to share what I learned from it with you in this article.

The 360-degree approach recognizes that little change can be expected without feedback, and that different constituencies are a source of rich and useful information to help managers guide their behavior. For instance, a subordinate’s perspective likely will be distinctly different from that of the supervisor, who is traditionally charged with evaluating a manager‘s performance. Crossing organisational boundaries can often be very interesting and quite a challenge but 360 degree feedbackcan be a really straight forward way to bridge cultural gaps. You may want to take the lead with the project and be clear what is going to be “core” to all users of the instrument. At the same time there may be a number of significant pieces to the 360 degree feedbackthat you can give over to the different businesses/parts of the organisation. 360-degree feedback is so named because it solicits feedback regarding an employee's behavior from a variety of points of view (subordinate, lateral, and supervisory). It therefore may be contrasted with "downward feedback" (traditional feedback on work behavior and performance delivered to subordinates by supervisory or management employees only; see traditional performance appraisal), or "upward feedback" delivered to supervisory or management employees by subordinates only. Over the years, organizations and management experts have experimented with using the 360 degree feedbackprocess as method for assessing performance. The challenge is that performance reviews attempt to measure a concept that is far different from what is measured when using a standard 360 degree Assessment. After implementing a 360 degree feedbackprocess, project administrators can compare these data taken under the traditional model with those from the new feedback process. Research from dozens of organizations shows that most employees prefer to receive feedback from more people than just their supervisor. If anyone is missed out of the 360 process, it means the process is no longer 360 degrees. It also means that you can miss out on vital information that can help the employee receive a proper appraisal about their performance.



A 360 review (also often called 360 degree feedbackasks for individual assessments across many different work relationships. 360 reviews provide an insightful, broad-picture assessment of an individual's behavior from multiple touchpoints. While most organizations are familiar with annual employee performance appraisals, a 360 review is not a performance review! The purpose of the 360-degree feedback is to assist each individual to understand their strengths and weaknesses and to contribute insights into aspects of their work that need professional development. Debates of all kinds are raging in the world of organizations about how to select the feedback tool and process, choose the raters and how to use and review the feedback. The abundance of information in the 360 degree feedbackprocess has led researchers and practitioners to explore possible improvements in reporting 360-degree feedback information. Issues related to attention mechanisms such as selective perception and information distortion are relevant. The clarity of the feedback report is an important factor affecting receptivity to the feedback. The type of questions featured in 360-degree feedback will vary depending on the roles and responsibilities of the employee in question, and the aspect of development the feedback relates to. Questions regarding the performance of a new hire who has reached the end of his or her probationary period will be significantly different to the questions asked relating to a long-term employee reaching their annual appraisal. The specificity/anonymity conundrum takes another turn when the idea of 360 appraisal is involved.

Career Development Initiatives

An opportunity for transformation comes from 360 degree feedbackdata exposing your facade. This is the stuff you are hiding from others or pretending about. You may portray yourself as organised and efficient to a new client for instance. After a while they may get to know you and realise you are not quite as organised as they thought and be disappointed. When an employee knows they are getting 360 degree feedbackfrom multiple sources, and don’t see the process as biased, they are more likely to take the learnings of the feedback process and implement them in their working life. Start the 360 degree feedbacksession with something like “Did you manage to read through your 360 degree feedbacksurvey then?” or “How has the 360 process been for you so far?” The participant may respond in full or with not much but usually they will express something of where they are at. They may complain about the process, lack of briefing, errors with reporting, confusion about reviewers, frustration about their boss not completing. They may say they did not want to participate at all or that they were not sure it was going to be at all helpful. Unfortunately, what we know about the integration of the large amount of data generated by 360-degree feedback is limited. People possess many mechanisms that distort, block, and amplify social information. One of the primary reasons 360-degree feedback is effective for individual development is that it minimizes the effect of these mechanisms and sends a clear message to the feedback recipient: This is where you stand in relation to the organization's standards. 360 degree respondents usually want to be honest and provide both positive and negative information, but they do not want to be responsible for singularly damaging someone else's career. Trimmed mean scoring relieves this concern because if a respondent's judgment is off base, it will be eliminated. Only when a number of people feel the same way will others receive critical feedback. Supporting the big vision encompassing 360 degree feedback system will lead to untold career development initiatives.

Gathering meaningful data can be hard work and then you might not be able to conclude anything useful from it! But there is this other big tendency called the observer effect23 which applies to the gathering of data and leads to the phenomenon described as “what you measure is what you get”. Anyone who exercises some form of leadership, particularly if they lead a team of people is suitable for 360 degree feedback. It is not appropriate for someone who is carrying out a technical role primarily as an individual contributor. The model is based on the premise that successful outcomes are achieved through people and enabled through leaders who are self-aware and values-driven. Critical for face validity is the right level of input and consultation in the design stage. Co-creation is the ideal process to ensure you get full face validity. Face validity is the most poignant and obvious to deal with but be wary of the other forms – just because a process looks like it covers the right stuff in a compelling way still does not mean the process is accurately measuring what you are wanting it to measure. More and more companies are seeing the benefits of having an open feedback culture, where feedback is given freely between employees. An anonymous approach to 360 feedback is completely at odds with this idea. If you want your culture to be feedback first, and have employees openly deliver feedback to one another you need a system that supports this. Whether it be an employee, team or leader, people need to know how they are performing and made aware of any areas in need of development. 360 Degree Feedback plays a pivotal role in providing that feedback in a structured way that minimises bias. Without this, individuals can lack self-awareness, miss important development opportunities and might find aspects of their job difficult, which could affect their relationships with others, their own performance and job satisfaction. Looking into 360 feedback software can be a time consuming process.

Explore The Gap Between Identity And Reputation

Helping leaders and employees grow and improve is only one part of the equation when it comes to effective 360 degree feedbackprograms. 360 degree feedbackcan be hard to gather, tabulate, and then distribute the insights to the right people. Technology helps solve these difficult logistical problems. Managers and employees want pay and promotion decisions to be fair. Research across large sets of employee groups indicate that users perceive 360 degree feedbackto be more fair than single-rate processes. When these decisions occur in a culture where rewards are based on performance or contribution rather than on seniority or politics, they will be fair. For 360 degree feedbackto work, everyone has to participate. The drawback of a 360 is that it is labor-intensive. Every employee requires feedback from multiple others, resulting in everyone in the company giving feedback to multiple people. For this reason, management has to set clear expectations, should be accountable for the successful completion of the feedback, and should help to create a climate of consistency and fairness for all stakeholders. Before you look to generate your 360 degree feedbackquestions you need to reflect on the framework (or frameworks) you are basing them on. You may be really clear what model or framework you are using – it may be your competency model (with or without levels) and/or it may be your values, or it may be another generic model that you have chosen to adopt or integrate. Coaching skills are very useful for 360 degree feedbackbut there are a number of skills that make a difference beyond the usual coaching requirements. A 360 degree feedbacksession is not simply coaching to the coachee’s agenda – there is a job to do to help and guide participants through the whole pack of data and then you need to challenge interpretations and meanings as well as the unpicking of upsets or negative emotions. People need to feel in control of their destiny - that is why a clear understanding of 360 degree feedback is important to any forward thinking organisation.

Care should be taken to specify just what the 360-degree feedback intervention actually encompasses. For example, is it simply providing participants with their feedback reports? Or is the 360degree feedback facilitated and part of a training program? Or is it integrated with a follow-up coaching relationship as part of an organizational change effort? Data can allow you to see a situation in technicolour/3D. Imagine you only have a traditional x-ray view of your organisation plus a heap of your own opinions and others too. Let’s imagine you gather some additional data by taking a closer look, using new diagnostic measures, paying more attention, looking for patterns and anomalies – a bit like getting an MRI18 scan. You will inevitably see a lot more detail. You may start to see how things connect and link and you may start to understand it better. So will your employees if they choose to look! The ability to check on progress toward goals is an important feature of any good development system, and many 360-degree instruments now provide postassessment services. PC-based instruments often have the capability of comparing data from different administrations of the instrument, allowing managers to track their scores over time. In order to design 360-degree feedback so that it enhances involvement, self-determination, and commitment, a number of things must be done. The first is to build trust. To build trust in the process and to protect the quality of ratings, steps must be taken to ensure the anonymity of raters and the confidentiality of the target manager's data. There’s strong evidence that it’s employees’ reactions to feedback, rather than the feedback itself, that influences future performance. So it’s crucial that employees see performance reviews as fair as well as useful and worthwhile checking in with employees afterwards to see if this is the case. Evaluating what is 360 degree feedback can uncover issues that may be affecting employee performance.

Personal And Organizational Performance Development

Once leaders begin to see the huge value to be gained from the 360 degree process, we see them add other groups to their raters such as suppliers, customers, or those two levels below them in the organization. 360-degree evaluations can go a long way to giving people the motivation they need to stretch themselves and reach their personal career objectives. If you are one of the reviewers in a 360 review, remember that your feedback doesn't have to focus on weaknesses. I can’t stress this point strongly enough: You are actually helping more when you focus on your colleague’s strengths. You can find further details relating to 360 evaluation tools in this NHS link.

Related Articles:

Elementary Mistakes We All Make With Regards To 360 Evaluation Systems
Real World Pro's Of 360 Degree Appraisal Technologies Put Across In Layman's Terminology
Important Insights Into 360-Degree Evaluation Instruments